![]() ![]() ![]() Once this pertinent rank-ordering has been expressly identified in Tel-Aviv, Israel's policy planners will then need to ensure that the Jewish state remains situated in an optimal position to control escalation. In 1991, and again in 2014, Dimona came under missile and rocket fire, from Iraqi and Hamas aggressions, respectively.įor Jerusalem, a key question should now arise: How shall Israel best respond? While assorted security threats could be intersecting, interpenetrating, or synergistic, there will still remain a more-or-less decipherable hierarchy of plausible dangers. This fearful scenario would not be unprecedented. At some point, moreover, these different types of enemy, whether individually or functioning together as adversarial "hybrids," could collaborate in unorthodox fashion, including perhaps an attack on Israel's Dimona nuclear reactor. Any such many-sided peril could involve both state and sub-state adversaries, sometimes in closely orchestrated concert with one another. Nonetheless, as terrorism and war are not mutually exclusive, Jerusalem must be careful not to deflect primary planning attention from more plainly existential conflicts.Īuthentic survival dangers stem largely from a prospectively expanding prospect of a regional conflict that involves weapons of mass destruction. Accordingly, it would now seem most sensible to orient the country's core national security focus toward these still anticipated crimes of violence. Even now, Israel must brace itself against intermittent waves of Palestinian terror. The more things change, the more they remain the same. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |